Panama vs Zimbabwe: Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported
Panama
1.9%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2024
Panama rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
28th
Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported over time
- Panama
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Panama ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 99 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.5% | 2.3% | 0.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 1.9% | 0.2% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported, Panama or Zimbabwe?
- Panama, at 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported between Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported?
- Panama ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.