Mus vs Solomon Islands: Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported
Mus
3.9%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
24.8%
in 2018
Mus rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported over time
- Mus
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 24.8% against 3.9% in Mus, a difference of 20.9%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 6.3 times Mus's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported, Mus or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 24.8% against 3.9% in Mus as of 2018.
- What is the difference in antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported between Mus and Solomon Islands?
- 20.9%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Mus and Solomon Islands rank globally for antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported?
- Mus ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.