Kiribati vs Samoa: Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported
Kiribati
0.2%
in 2019
Samoa
0.3%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
72nd
Samoa rank
69th
Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.4 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 72nd and Samoa ranks 69th of 99 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 0.1%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported?
- Kiribati ranks 72nd and Samoa ranks 69th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.