Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported
Costa Rica
1.9%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
28th
Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported over time
- Costa Rica
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 99 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9% | 2.3% | 1.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 1.9% | 0.5% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
- Costa Rica, at 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported?
- Costa Rica ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.