Botswana vs Timor-Leste: 3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of
Botswana
86
in 2022
Timor-Leste
86
in 2022
Botswana rank
118th
Timor-Leste rank
118th
3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of over time
- Botswana
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 86 against 86 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 118th and Timor-Leste ranks 118th of 195 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.12 | 63.12 | 33 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 95 | 79.2 | 15.8 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 92 | 86 | 6 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of, Botswana or Timor-Leste?
- Botswana, at 86 against 86 in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
- What is the difference in 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of between Botswana and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Timor-Leste?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Timor-Leste rank globally for 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of?
- Botswana ranks 118th and Timor-Leste ranks 118th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as 3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.