Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: 3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of
Bosnia and Herzegovina
75
in 2022
El Salvador
75
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
160th
El Salvador rank
160th
3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- El Salvador
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 75 against 75 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 160th and El Salvador ranks 160th of 195 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.3 | 92.9 | 4.6 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 82.5 | 88.7 | 6.2 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 73.67 | 75.33 | 1.67 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of, Bosnia and Herzegovina or El Salvador?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 75 against 75 in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of between Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador rank globally for 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 160th and El Salvador ranks 160th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as 3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.