Belgium vs Nauru: 3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of
Belgium
98
in 2022
Nauru
98
in 2022
Belgium rank
22nd
Nauru rank
22nd
3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of over time
- Belgium
- Nauru
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 98 against 98 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 22nd and Nauru ranks 22nd of 195 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.5 | 82.8 | 13.7 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 98.3 | 92 | 6.3 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 97.67 | 97 | 0.6667 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of, Belgium or Nauru?
- Belgium, at 98 against 98 in Nauru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of between Belgium and Nauru?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nauru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Belgium and Nauru rank globally for 3.b.1 proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of?
- Belgium ranks 22nd and Nauru ranks 22nd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as 3.b.1 Proportion of surviving infants receiving 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.