China vs Latvia: 3.1.2 Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel
China
100
in 2016
Latvia
100
in 2017
China rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
3.1.2 Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 100 against 100 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.93 | 99.13 | 0.2 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 99.83 | 98.9 | 0.9286 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 3.1.2 proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel, China or Latvia?
- China, at 100 against 100 in Latvia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in 3.1.2 proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel between China and Latvia?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for 3.1.2 proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel?
- China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as 3.1.2 Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.