Botswana vs Latvia: 3.1.2 Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%)
Botswana
100
in 2020
Latvia
100
in 2017
Botswana rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
3.1.2 Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%) over time
- Botswana
- Latvia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 100 against 100 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.
Botswana ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.47 | 99.13 | 1.67 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 99.66 | 99.04 | 0.625 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 3.1.2 proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel, Botswana or Latvia?
- Botswana, at 100 against 100 in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in 3.1.2 proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel between Botswana and Latvia?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
- How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for 3.1.2 proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel?
- Botswana ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as 3.1.2 Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.